OMM Newsroom
Disruptions to satellite links used by Ukrainian forces have affected drone operations. The situation has put the spotlight on Starshield, a less widely known service from Elon Musk’s SpaceX, and raised questions about who controls its use.
Unlike Starlink, Starshield is designed for military and intelligence purposes. Although the two services share satellite technologies, their terms of use and restrictions differ.
How Starshield differs from Starlink
Starshield is a military and intelligence satellite service that provides secure communications and other capabilities to the U.S. government and its partners. It is based on technologies developed for SpaceX’s commercial satellite internet network, Starlink.
According to SpaceX, Starshield’s core services include secure communications, Earth observation, and the integration of sensors and other equipment with satellite systems. Its communications services use enhanced encryption and specialized terminals. Reuters has reported that the system also relies on Starlink’s extensive satellite network.
Starlink is primarily a commercial service that provides broadband internet to homes, businesses, aircraft and other customers. Starshield, by contrast, is designed for government, military and intelligence operations.
SpaceX says Starlink should not be used for offensive military operations, while Starshield is tailored to military needs. In a post on X on October 14, Elon Musk said Starlink is a commercial service owned by SpaceX, while Starshield systems are owned and controlled by the U.S. government.
Starshield systems are owned by and under the control of the U.S. government. Any restrictions on speed and use are determined by the U.S. military and ultimately by the president. Starlink is a commercial service owned by SpaceX and can be used for civilian or defensive purposes; using it in offensive operations would not be appropriate for a commercial company.
However, both services are based on the same technology and, in some cases, satellite infrastructure. As a result, the practical distinction between them may not always be clear.
Restrictions on satellite links in Ukraine
Ukraine has said that restrictions on military satellite links have disrupted drone strikes and air defense operations.
Ukrainian official Mykhailo Fedorov said on October 14 that Starlink connectivity had been restored for equipment traveling at speeds of up to 160 kilometers per hour. He also called for the speed restriction applied to Starshield to be lifted, saying this was important for Ukraine’s defense capabilities.
Speed restrictions matter when satellite-connected drones are moving toward their targets. Ukraine uses satellite-linked systems for a range of tasks, including repelling Russian attacks. Restrictions on fast-moving equipment could therefore affect military operations beyond ordinary internet access.
According to Musk, restrictions on the use and speed of Starshield systems are set by the U.S. military and ultimately by the president. His remarks indicate that while SpaceX provides the technology, decisions about the military service’s use are made in Washington.
Musk’s statement does not independently confirm who ordered the restrictions on Ukraine or why they were imposed. Based on information available as of October 14, the White House had not publicly confirmed responsibility.
According to Reuters, the United Kingdom has deployed Starshield, while New Zealand is assessing its potential military use.
Growing reliance on private satellite networks raises questions about access to communications, contract terms and operational restrictions. The central issue is who controls these services and whether their use can be limited at a critical moment.
