OMM Redaksiyası
Tata Sons, the holding company of India’s Tata Group, is facing growing uncertainty after its board reappointed chairman N Chandrasekaran and supported a potential public listing despite opposition from Tata Trusts, the company’s largest shareholder.
Tata Trusts, which owns 66% of Tata Sons, has described the board’s decision as “illegal” under the company’s articles of association and has reiterated its opposition to a stock market listing, according to the BBC.
The dispute could intensify at Tata Sons’ next Annual General Meeting. The meeting must be held before 31 December, according to reports, although no new date has been announced after the previous gathering was adjourned because of a lack of quorum.
Chairman’s reappointment challenged
Chandrasekaran has received a five-year extension and will turn 65 in 2028. Tata Trusts is expected to vote against his reappointment, potentially putting his future at the group in question.
Mumbai-based corporate lawyer Nitin Potdar told the BBC that the board’s Nomination and Remuneration Committee could only recommend the appointment, rather than approve it. He also said the decision appeared to conflict with Tata Sons’ governance rules requiring executives to leave active roles at the age of 65.
Shares of Tata Group companies initially rose before falling as tensions increased, reflecting uncertainty over leadership and business continuity. Chandrasekaran has overseen major investments in areas including semiconductors and aviation, some of which have yet to become profitable.
Listing dispute moves closer to courts
The wider conflict centres on whether Tata Sons must become a publicly listed company. In 2022, the Reserve Bank of India classified Tata Sons as an “upper layer non-banking financial company” because of its systemic importance and investment activities. That classification created a potential listing requirement.
Tata Sons sought to avoid the framework by repaying debt and arguing that it did not borrow directly from public markets. However, the RBI rejected the company’s application earlier this month after considering it for more than two years, bringing Tata Sons closer to a stock market debut.
Tata Trusts said it was examining “all available options and not a listing alone”. Potdar said the RBI could not force a company to go public and predicted that Tata Trusts would challenge the issue in court. The central bank has separately approached the courts to ensure it can be heard first in any proceedings concerning the listing.
Arguments over Tata’s future structure
Supporters of a listing say it would improve transparency and accountability at a group that plays a major role in India’s economy. Collectively, listed Tata companies including “Tata Motors” and “TCS” have a market capitalisation of more than $260 billion and are linked to 17.7 million retail shareholders, pension funds, insurers and mutual funds, according to investment advisory firm InGovern.
InGovern said Tata Sons could no longer reasonably remain outside the governance and transparency expectations applied to systemically important financial and industrial conglomerates. The group has also made major global investments, including manufacturing “iPhones” for “Apple” and partnerships with “Nvidia”, “Boeing”, “Airbus” and “Singapore Airlines”.
Opponents of a listing argue that it could weaken Tata Trusts’ ability to direct dividends towards hospitals, universities and research. They also fear that public shareholders would increase pressure for short-term financial returns and reduce the group’s ability to support struggling businesses.
The timing of a potential initial public offering is another concern. Tata Sons faces substantial financial commitments linked to “Air India”, recently established subsidiaries and long-term projects, while some newer ventures continue to report losses. A prospectus would have to disclose subsidiary borrowings and losses, which could make the group less attractive to investors.
Tata Trusts’ controlling economic interest and veto rights also affect board appointments and major capital-allocation decisions. Experts say the increasingly strained relationship between the board and its largest shareholder could complicate efforts to restructure “Air India” and raise funds to repay the Shapoorji Pallonji Group, a significant minority shareholder.
Whatever the outcome, analysts expect further twists in the dispute as Tata Sons, one of India’s oldest corporate groups, enters an uncertain period over its leadership, ownership structure and future public status.
